What if it Were You Essay Example for Free

What if it Were You Essay Probably the most debated topic today is abortion. It is uncommon for the topic to be brought up when new friends are first meeting because almost everyone has a stand on the issue, and there are only two possible stands (which happen to be largely the opposite). According to the Websters dictionary, the definition of abortion is: expulsion of a fetus from the womb before it is viable. You might say that this definition is a little unclear because we must ask, what does Webster mean by viable? In the same edition, the definition of viable is: able to take root and grow. Now I dont know about you, but I think that if you nourish and feed a fetus from the first day of conception properly, it will be able to take root and grow. If you dont believe me, every single human life today (including yours and mine) are walking proof of this. So then, if the definition of abortion is a fetus expelled before it can take root and grow, the definition contradicts itself, and abortion is therefore the expulsion of a human. Now where Im from, expulsion of a human is a crime in which in most cases is punishable by death if not life imprisonment. I cant even begin to understand how the issue of abortion is even a question, or  much less exists! What a sick and twisted world we live in. Its a good thing for all those hardcore pro-choicers out there that their mothers happened to be pro-life. Ironic, huh? I am going to give a few arguments against abortion, and I will then look at the opposing views and make a rebuttal. The first and foremost argument is that abortion is just wrong it is the killing of the innocent(Pearce 7). Considering that the majority of America and this world believe in (a similar) God, God definitely is pro-life (or at least his mother was). Anyone that wants to follow God simply cannot be for abortion under any circumstances. God is the creator of life and intended for a child to be born the natural way not sucked up by a vacuum and discarded into a trashcan. Now if youre not one of those people that believe in God, you might still be against murder. Im telling you that abortion is no different than murder. The major question that comes into  mind for many Christians is: When does a fetus/baby have a soul? or rather, When is the fetus a human? A medical group of biochemists and geneticists were asked the same question, and found 19 to 1 that: The majority of our group could find no point in time between the union of sperm and egg, or at least the blastocyst stage, and the birth of the infant at which  point we could say that this was not a human life. A good comparison to remember is that a fetus is to a baby as a ten year old child is to an adult: each is just an older version of the former (and all are human). There are many women that have now gone insane because of abortions. They realize what they have done and feel as if they have killed the very child they should have loved(Green 1). The number one comeback to any pro-life arguments is that abortion is the womans right to choose. My rebuttal is simply, What if the aborted fetus was a female (or hence a woman), Where the heck was her so-called right to choose? The same excuse can be made for a mother of ten children all under the age of 11, that wants to kill herself. She might say, Its my body, my life, why the heck cant I commit suicide? I have the right to choose death. I would say that no, she really doesnt have that right because she will be affecting at the lives of at least ten other people. Im gonna guess that those ten kids cant probably survive too well without her. So does she have the right to choose death of her own body, much less that of somebody elses (the unwanted fetus)? Heck NO! My question is why doesnt a woman have the right to choose  right after the baby has been born? Or does she. Partial-birth abortion is a practice supported by many pro-choicers in which the baby is killed after it has partially been born. If a woman held a gun to her child after it was halfway out and shot it, would it be murder? What about  ¾ of the way out? What if the baby is only connected by the toe, or to the umbilical cord? Its considered murder if the mother shoots her baby once it is completely out of the womb. a In regards to my statement that women who have had abortions often go insane, many people believe that it is the fault of us pro-lifers that we are too harsh, and therefore make them feel remorseful. The fact is, the truth hurts. If someone killed someone, and then was told how bad it was, they would feel sorry too. Everyone today wants to never be told what is right and wrong, so that they cant be held culpable for their actions. That is just like Platos allegory of the cave, in which everyone is tied up and watches shadows on the wall, not realizing that there is another world out there. One man (Socrates) unties himself and escapes. When he comes back to tell everyone about this whole new world, they beat him up and choose to deny it. And as in Platos day, there are many of us who  wish not to see the truth and take the easy way out. We must all do what Socrates did: escape from the world and find and preach the truth. Another argument made for abortion is: What if a teenage girl is raped? My answer is Give it up for adoption! One might answer me back and say, There are already too many orphaned kids who arent that well taken care of. My answer is to ask those poor orphaned kids if they would rather be alive than dead by putting a gun up to their head, or better yet, threaten them with a vacuum to suck their brains out. I can almost guarantee you that they will choose life, and be happy that their mothers also did. One final argument for abortion is people want to know what if the child will be disabled? First of all, go see the movie that is based on a true story, RADIO. Disabled people can teach so many people how to love. They have taught me what unconditional love is. But aside from all this, just like with the orphaned kids, just put a gun up to them, and they will probably give you some indication to stop. After reading a first draft of  this essay, one of my peers asked me, Should a person who has no sign of consciousness (retarded) and does nothing good to this world be entitled to live? My answer is Why would they  not be entitled to live? Even if we knew that someone was going to do harm to this world, it would be murder to kill him. If someone had killed Hitler before he had done so much evil, it wouldve still been murder. There once was a pregnant woman who had syphilis and was an alcoholic, and the father was also an alcoholic. Should she have aborted her baby, who had such a high risk of turning out deformed? If she had aborted that baby, she wouldve killed Beethoven. (True story!) Finally, I would like to conclude with the steps in an abortion process. There are types of induced abortions: Dilatation and curettage; Suction; Hysterotomy; and saline poisoning. Dilatation and curettage, or D and C is a process by which the doctor sticks an instrument (curette) up into the uterus, and cuts the baby to pieces, and then scrapes all the pieces out (Wilkes 18). Blood is not uncommon. Suction is a method by which the baby is sucked through a vacuum and then spit into a tube into many pieces. Hysterotomy is similar to a Caesarian section in which the doctor cuts open the mothers stomach, and then throws the baby away. (See pictures attached.) The saline poisoning method is done by injecting a needle of poison into the amniotic sack of the baby, and watching it go into  convulsions for about an hour, and then dies. The mother goes through labor, and delivers a dead baby. By the way, science now tells us that a baby has a fully developed nervous system at three months, and can thus feel everything. In the movie The Silent Scream, the doctors poke the baby, and you can see it jump and writhe in pain. People today just dont have hearts anymore. So I hope I have convinced you that abortion is wrong and evil, and must be banned. Some say that there is another civil war to be fought over  abortion. This might seem a bit rash, but the truth is, abortion is that serious.

Desert Winds And Electrical Energy Essay -- essays research papers

Desert Winds and Electrical Energy   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  The energy of the wind can be channeled into other forms of energy besides the energy used as an erosional agent. This is especially true of desert winds. Today, some desert wind is used to make electricity.   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Wind velocity is affected by air temperature. When air warms and cools, it changes density, which creates air pressure differences that cause wind. In the desert, temperatures may range from 40 º F at night to more than 120 º F in the daytime. Because of this temperature fluctuation, wind is generally stronger in desert areas.   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  There are many windy areas in California. It is usually windier during the summer months when wind rushes in from cooler areas, like the ocean to replace hot rising air in California’s deserts.   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  In Southern California, the hot air from the desert goes up and out over the Coast Range, reaching seaward. When it cools off it descends and flows back toward the land and re-enters the desert through such loop holes in the Coast Range as the San Gorgonio Pass – the old Puerta de San Carlos – above Indio. The rush of wind through this particular pass is quite violent at times. For wind is very much like water and seeks the least obstructed path. Throughout the San Gorgonio Pass there are wind-eroded ledges attesting to the violent winds that pass through it.   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  The San Go...

Boy Scouts of America vs. Dale

At a time when the United States government is doing all it can to do away with discrimination based on race, age, gender, and religious persuasion in all aspects of the American society, the Boy Scouts of America should not be allowed to exercise discriminatory practices in the process of accepting its members. In this connection, the United States Supreme Court may have erred in its decision with regards the discrimination case filed by James Dale against the Boy Scouts of America in 1992.James Dale’s scouting life started at a tender age of eight when he was accepted as a member of Cub Scout Pack 142 of the Monmouth Council in 1978. By 1981 Dale was already a Boy Scout. In 1988, he was awarded one of the highest honors in scouting – the Eagle Scout rank – after seven years. The following year, 1989, his application for adult membership was approved, becoming an â€Å"assistant scoutmaster of Troop 73† in the process. Between 1981 and 1989, his performan ce as a Boy Scout was nothing short of exemplary (Cornell University Law School, n. d. ).His troubles began when he attended Rutgers University where he immediately acknowledged that he was gay and became the â€Å"copresident† of the alliance of gays and lesbians in the university. In 1990, in his capacity as copresident of their alliance, Dale attended a seminar which confronted the psychological as well as health needs of teenage gays and lesbians. During the seminar, Dale was interviewed regarding his gay advocacy. The Monmouth Council finally learned about his being gay after the interview was published sometime in July 1990, complete with Dale’s picture.That same month, his membership with the Monmouth Council was immediately revoked because, according to James Kay, the council executive who advised him about the revocation, the â€Å"Boy Scouts specifically forbid membership to homosexuals† (Cornell University Law School, n. d. ). The case that ensued sho wed that the country’s courts did not agree whether the Boy Scouts of America was justified in revoking the adult membership of James Dale.Dale first brought the matter to the New Jersey Superior Court in 1992. In his complaint, he claimed that the revocation of his adult membership by the Monmouth Council on the basis of his being gay was in violation not only of the â€Å"public accommodations statute† of the State of New Jersey but also the common law. He alleged that the public accommodations law of the state â€Å"prohibits, among other things, discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation in places of public accommodation† (N.J. Stat. Ann.  §Ã‚ §10:5-4 and 10:5-5 West Supp. 2000 as cited in Cornell University Law School, n. d. ). However, the decision of the Chancery Division of the Superior Court of New Jersey favored the Boy Scouts, stating that the New Jersey law on public accommodations could not be applied in his case because the â€Å"Boy Scou ts was not a place of public accommodation,† that it was, in fact, a private entity and thus was not covered by the public accommodations statute.The Chancery Division also declared that the position held by the Boy Scouts in relation to ‘active homosexuality† was very clear, therefore, it could not be forced to accept active homosexuals like Dale into its membership as provided for by the â€Å"freedom of expressive association† of the First Amendment.It also stated that the common law was likewise inapplicable since the appropriate policy of the state of New Jersey was contained in the public accommodations law and not the common law (Cornell University Law School, n. d. ). In the first instance of disagreement which underlined the case, the Appellate Division of the Superior Court reversed the Chancery Division’s ruling, stating that the Boy Scouts was covered by the public accommodations law.In revoking Dale’s membership, the Boy Scouts, th erefore, violated the law. Sometime later, in affirming the ruling of the Appellate Division, the New Jersey Supreme Court said that the Boy Scouts of America â€Å"was a place of public accommodation subject to the public accommodation law, that the organization was not exempt from the law under any of its express exceptions, and that the Boy Scouts violated the law by revoking Dale’s membership based on his avowed homosexuality† (Cornell University Law School, n.d. ). The New Jersey Supreme Court also addressed the Boy Scouts’ claim that its federal constitutional right â€Å"to enter into and maintain †¦intimate or private relationships †¦ [and] to associate for the purpose of engaging in protected speech† had been violated when the public accommodations law was applied to the case.According to the court, the Boy Scouts is not private enough to deserve the constitutional protection of intimate association for several reasons: first, it is a r ather large organization; second, its purpose is characterized by inclusiveness, not exclusiveness; and, third, it allows and even invites outsiders to attend their meetings. The court agreed with the Boy Scouts that its activities are geared towards encouraging the members’ moral development.Nevertheless, it is of the opinion that the Boy Scouts do not group together for the express purpose of denouncing homosexuality as immoral (Cornell University Law School, n. d. ). Because of the foregoing reasons, the New Jersey Supreme Court decided that retaining Dale as a member of the organization would not be violating the â€Å"right of expressive association† of the Boy Scouts since his membership would have no significant effect on how the members would be performing their duties and obligations.The court further explained that it would be to the best interest of the State of New Jersey to actively participate in the process of eliminating discrimination and all its harmf ul consequences. Finally, it stated that it rejected the reference made by the Boy Scouts to Hurley v. Irish-American Gay, Lesbian and Bisexual Group of Boston in its attempt to justify its revocation of Dale’s adult membership.According to the court, the Hurley case could not be made a precedent to decide the case for the Boy Scouts since â€Å"the reinstatement of Dale does not compel Boy Scouts to express any message† (Cornell University Law School, n. d. ). When the issue was elevated to the United States Supreme Court, a polarized America surfaced. The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), together with some other interested parties, submitted briefs of amici curiae which urged the United States Supreme Court to affirm the decision made by the New Jersey Supreme Court.Taking the side of ACLU and, thus, Dale, were the states of New Jersey, New York, California, Hawaii, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Oklahoma, Vermont, Washington, Atlanta City, and the â⠂¬Å"American Association of School Administrators, American Bar Association, American Civil Liberties Union, American Jewish Congress, American Psychological Association, American Public Health Association, Bay Area Lawyers for Individual Freedom, Deans of Divinity Schools and Rabbinical Institutions, National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, Parents, Families, and Friends of Lesbians and Gays, Society of American Law Teachers, [and] Roland Pool† (ACLU ProCon. org, n. d. ). Their side was argued by Evan Wolfson who was assisted by Ruth E. Harlow, David Buckel, Jon W. Davidson, Beatrice Dohrn, Patricia M. Logue, Thomas J. Moloney, Allyson W. Haynes, and Lewis H. Robertson (ACLU ProCon. org, n. d. ). If several organizations and parties sympathized with the cause of Dale, there were also those who believed that the Boy Scouts of America was right in excluding him.Those who decided to file their amici curiae and urge the United States Supreme Court to reverse th e New Jersey Supreme Court were: â€Å"Agudath Israel of America, American Center for Law and Justice, American Civil Rights Union, Becket Fund for Religious Liberty, California State Club Association, Center for the Original Intent of the Constitution, Christian Legal Society, Claremont Institute Center, Eagle Forum Education & Legal Defense Fund, Family Defense Council, Family Research Council, Gays and Lesbians for Individual Liberty, Individual Rights Foundation, Institute for Public Affairs of teh Union of Orthodox Jewish Congregations of America, Liberty Legal Institute, National Catholic Committee on Scouting, National Legal Foundation, Pacific Legal Foundation, Public Advocate of the United States, United States Catholic Conference, [and] John J. Hurley. † Their case was argued by George A. Davidson who had the assistance of Carla A. Kerr, David K. Park, Michael W. McConnell, and Sanford D. Brown (ACLU ProCon. org, n. d. ). The U. S. Supreme Court agreed to review Dal e’s case on January 14, 2000. By April 26, 2000, oral arguments were heard and two months later on June 28, 2000, in a final show of disagreement among the courts of the country, it handed down a decision reversing the New Jersey Supreme Court, thereby agreeing with the Boy Scouts of America that James Dale should indeed be excluded from its membership. The U. S.Supreme Court decision showed just how divided America was, on the issue, by registering the slimmest of margin with a 5-4 decision (Scouting For All, n. d. ). Even the political leaders of the country were divided on the issue. A few days before the U. S. Supreme Court was to come out with its decision, President Clinton signed Executive Order 13160 which banned discrimination against homosexuals. The 2000 party platform of the Republican Party, on the other hand, contradicted the executive order by supporting the Boy Scouts of America (Tax Analysts, 2000). In effect, the U. S. Supreme Court declared that the Boy Sco uts of America (BSA) is an organization which is private enough to be able to decide whether to accept or reject homosexuals. Some quarters, however, question this decision.They assert that if BSA is indeed private, it should stop accepting government support like tax exemptions and direct funding subsidies. For instance, between 1997 and 2001 alone, the Pentagon provided BSA Jamborees with assistance in the tune of $6 – $8 million. Now, if it wants to continue enjoying these subsidies, it must be honorable enough to honestly pronounce itself public and stop discriminating gays. As Linda Hills of ACLU appropriately expressed, â€Å"The Boy Scouts can’t have it both ways†¦If they truly are a private †¦organization, free to engage in any form of discrimination they choose, then they are not entitled to a government subsidy† (McElroy, 2005).

Economy Science And Technology - 1428 Words

Danny Dextre Kevin Wilson Hum 110-358 10/2/2014 Economy Innovated Through Science Technology When we look at science and technology in today’s current society, our economy plays a key role. Through science and technology, the most we look for in the economic world is the creation of jobs, created innovative ideas, and steps to make companies more profitable. These are things that I believe would help benefit the economy through scientific technological innovation. In the prehistoric ages, our economy would have not existed if man had not created the wheel and without the use of science and technology, we would not be creating new job or having new innovated ideas to better the companies around the world. The economy depends upon scientific technological resources. Today’s companies most are producing enough goods and demands to where those demands help to generate the creation of new jobs, and also helps companies to keep their competitive edge in order to stay above every one of their competitors. In most cases, being is a lot easier than being unemployed, u nemployed people who are actively trying to find work and get discouraged due to the jobs available or what companies are generally hiring for. There is a conservative idea that cutting taxes for the lower, middle, and upper classes with jobs, but that will not work now or in the future. In today’s society, the government is not certain that jobs will not be sustained, but we need to come up with innovatedShow MoreRelatedSpeech On Good Choices1014 Words   |  5 Pagesthe circular economy is vital for climate change mitigation. However, non-recyclable waste products (e.g. contaminated plastic, paper, diapers, medical waste, waste biomass, anaerobic digestion and industrial byproducts, etc.) are very difficult to recycle and reuse. Using appropriate Waste-to-Energy technologies, non-recyclable waste can be converted into higher value clean energy products, diverted from landfills and prevent contamination of air, water, and land. The circular economy could be basedRead MoreH ow Does Science Affect The Economy1268 Words   |  6 Pages How does Science Affect the Economy Schiller International University Name: Frank A. Lloyd Professor: Dr. Hartman Read MoreThe Impacts of Science on Human Life Essay595 Words   |  3 PagesTechnology is evolving and scientists are frequently developing new concepts and theories, improving our life style and making the world ultimately a better place to live in. Science has led to many extraordinary inventions, filling our human mind with vast amount of knowledge and intelligence. For example, many types of new planets have been discovered recently. Although people have been living in the world for a very long time, it is quite recent that these planets have been discovered using telescopeRead MoreHow Is a Good Life Defined, and What Is My Plan to Achieve It?828 Words   |  4 Pagesis a good life defined, and what is my plan to achieve it? The good life is happy and comfortable by self. I think it mainly embodied in the following aspects: political science, economy, education, love, science and technology. Two important of these aspects is education and love. Political, economy, science and technology is based on education. Political, has plenty of free elections and the political liberty. If the people want to earn these rights, the people should be honesty and fairnessRead MoreThe Importance Of Economic Globalization704 Words   |  3 PagesMainly in the following four pointsï ¼Å¡ First, optimize the allocation and rational use. No matter how high the efficiency of a countrys economy is running, it must continue to be limited by its own resources and markets. Only by integrating global resources and markets can a countrys economy get rid of the shackles of resources and markets to the maximum extent under the current conditions. Economic globalization can bring about the most advantageous conditions for production, sell in the most favorableRead MoreThe Sky Is The Limit944 Words   |  4 Pagesidea of limitlessness concerning the exploitation of our world’s resources. I agree with the fact that many resources that we have are underappreciated and over used. Berry describes our current economic state as, â€Å"a commonly accepted basis of our economy is the supposed possibility of limitless growth, limitless wants, limitless wealth, limitless natural resources, limitless energy, and limitless debt.† As a society as a whole, we continue to spend a nd use and spend and use without any regard ofRead MoreThe NSI And Japans National System Of Innovation Model921 Words   |  4 Pageson the flows and relationships of knowledge and technology among people, enterprises, and institutions, especially for analysis on â€Å"knowledge based economies – economies which are directly based on the production, distribution and use of knowledge and information† (OECD, 1997). Japan is considerably one of these knowledge based economies. As an overview, Japan is aiming to shift more so from DUI (doing, using, interacting) to STI (science, technology, innovation) solutions in the near future. ThereRead MoreThe Importance Of Space Exploration1622 Words   |  7 Pagesas there does not appear to any direction or goal; whereas, other countries have dramatically increased their commitment to space. Examples are China, sending men to space and India, which is sending satellites to Mars. Space exploration drives economies and consequen tly, these other countries are becoming industrial powerhouses. America is in danger of losing its place as a leader in everything connected with space. The discoveries that have stemmed from research in space exploration, have givenRead MoreContent Analysis Essay1326 Words   |  6 Pagesinclude world population, economy, disaster costs, global health, climate change and global warming, environmental issues, water crises, education and employment, migration, science and technology, and outlook. Each section builds from the previous section. The sections part priority into messages of the magnitude, importance and direction of natural disasters, global warming, overpopulation, and industrialization. Recurrent words are population and over population, economy, natural disaster, dataRead MoreThe Future Of Workforce During America1495 Words   |  6 PagesThe Future of Workforce in America The origin of the industrial revolution, which later made America the greatest economy in the world, had its roots in America’s advanced position in science and innovation. Ford’s Assembly line is one such example of innovation; it resulted in mass-production and made America the largest manufacturing country in the world. Manufacturing industries than became the foundation of economic growth, and provided jobs to many Americans and immigrants. United States retained